Another point of admiration is pacing and structure. Each character has a rather complex backstory, but somehow Yates slips it in almost between the lines of the forward action. There's very little "flashback" -- a lot of it comes about as summary narrative in the form of in-the-moment thoughts. So tricky, so seamless. I can't express how much I love this book.
Another inspiration that came my way via Hopie and Andy -- and Netflix -- is the film "Starting Out in the Evening." I hadn't read the novel, but there are many moments in the movie that I am certain come directly from the book, particularly some odd gestures like the graduate student suddenly kissing the old writer's hand; smearing honey on his face; the way they lie side by side, crosswise, on the bed, like corpses. These bits, strung together, pull the characters to life, but it's their motivations -- again, specific, particular, complicated -- that create understanding and empathy. And like Revolutionary Road, nearly all of the "action" is interior: what choices will each person make, and why? How will they respond to each other in light of new information? How will their relationships change? How will they change?
I'm a sucker for complicated characters in ordinary situations, and writing that elevates them to individual human status. I haven't written a lick in two weeks, but because of these two influences, the book and the film, I'm jazzed about picking up the next scene of my novel. Not bad.
Saw Dr. J yesterday, who upped me to 50 mcg fentanyl patches and suggested we take off a couple of weeks before going back for another round of chemo. OK.
After five and a half years, I still feel very much a rookie at this parenting business. However, occasionally I stumble onto something that works and makes me feel like a genius. Therefore, I hereby present a Parent Trick:
M took A to work with him this morning -- she is excited because she will get to sit in on two meetings, which makes her feel very grown up, since "meeting" is the euphemism M and I use when we go somewhere she is not invited. "Miss Amanda is coming over tonight to hang out with you." "Why?" "Mama and Papa have to go to a meeting." Worked for my parents, and so far, it's working for me and M.
Off to read and, perhaps, write.
3 comments:
About a third of the way into the meeting, A, internally of course, is going to say to herself "something's amiss here - what would anybody voluntarily subject themselves to these things?" And then next time you guys say you have to go to a "meeting" she'll feel sorry for you. My last shreds of innocence were lost when I realized that the busy adult world was full of nothing but endless meetings. OTOH, it just goes to show: work is not that different from play in the sense that its most made-up, mostly group hallucination; but work sux, and play is. . . what we live for pretty much, right? I'm rambling, sorry.
Good to hear you're reading and writing. Have fun tonight, and my deepest, best wishes for your 2009.
Speaking of adult life, I was reading through Daily Routines http://dailyroutines.typepad.com/daily_routines/ and I noticed that none of these eminences routines included "go to clinic for dose of chemotherapy"; or even for that matter something as basic and seemingly universal as "wake up and go to day job".
Interesting nonetheless.
I like Flaubert's routine, which seems to hinge on intimidating the help.
Today's excuse for not writing: lack of a valet.
Among those profiled, only Kafka seems to have had a day job. Unless you count poor Emily Dickinson at the seminary.
Chemo has kicked my tail the last few weeks. I know because the effects of the last treatment (Dec. 26) are finally waning, and I'm feeling more like myself. The big question: will I be able to write -- more -- in the next week, despite no valet?
Thanks for stopping by, and happy new year.
E.
Post a Comment